#couscousforcomment getting revenge on ‘influencers’

In Food, Media and Communications, Queensland

The word ‘influencer’ sends shivers down the spines of marketers and restaurateurs – but now the industries and the tax man are getting revenge.

Taxman to put influencers off their meals

Enjoy restaurants? Sick of cat ­videos and memes? Jump on Insta­gram and follow #couscousforcomment for some light relief as the restaurant industry turns the tables on the ­ultimate millennial vocation, the “influencer”.

The Facebook-owned, image-based platform is huge in restaurant land and has spawned thou­sands of influencers whose “business model” is chasing free meals in exchange for social media posts, usually on Instagram, of varying ­return on investment to the ­restaurants.

But a couple of high-profile cases have played out in social and traditional media recently, with restaurateurs telling would-be collaborators exact­ly what they think of the concept of giving away profit for dubious return.

One, in Adelaide, saw prominent chef Duncan Welgemoed engaged in an online spat with a former My Kitchen Rules contestant looking for a freebie that made its way to the front page of Adelaide’s The Advertiser.

Another in Brisbane this week resulted in a so-called influencer — spurned by a new restaurant — posting fake revenge ­“reviews” at Google Reviews. Unfortunately, many in the hospitality industry feel conflicted by incessant overtures to “collaborate” on social media exchanges for meals, asking themselves: “What happens if we don’t go along with this?”

“I don’t think you really need to respond to them,” said chef Joel Valvasori, who owns Lulu La ­Delizia restaurant in Perth’s ­Subiaco. “We ignore them; they’d just take up too much of our day otherwise.”

He described “influencer” as “a bit of a lazy vocation, trying to make a career out of nothing”, although­ he acknowledged that some businesses felt vulnerable to constant overtures for collaborations. “Personally, I’m very scep­tical about instant celebrity … and I think the whole influencer thing will pass when people cotton on to just how much fluff is out there.”

From July, such undeclared Instagram endorsements of rest­aurants, cafes, bars and pubs in return­ ­for freebies might constit­ute a tax problem.

It may be news to many influencers that in-kind receipt of goods and services is taxable, but tax lawyer Chris Davis, of Mc­Innes Wilson Lawyers, said: “Constructive or actual receipt of non-cash benefits has always been taxable.” Using trusts and companies won’t work for avoiding declaring “in-kind” income.

Imminent changes to the law first proposed in last year’s federal budget­ and flagged in a Treasury discussion paper in December­ may also hit the Instafamous industr­y. From July 1, all income, including­ all non-cash benefits, will be treated as part of an indiv­idual’s taxable income and will be taxed accordingly at higher rates than apply to the companies and trusts used to date.

Non-cash income, such as meals, earned via reputation will be taxed at the higher personal rate and cannot be shielded by a trust or other corporate entity at a lower one.

You may also read!

Tales of bravery from WA

Car saves, dog saves and ocean saves credited in WA's bravery awards WA bravery awards include girl who saved sister

Read More...

#yarrieyarns highlighting outback good times

A FNQ cop has gotten a social media campaign going to highlight the positives of indigenous rural life. Aboriginal community

Read More...

Operator’s fight to keep semi-native attraction

Daylesford Council have used forced to remove a grand attraction. 'A day of savagery': Daylesford locals in confrontation to stop

Read More...

Mobile Sliding Menu