Probuild collapse shows a broken system

In Business Resources, Community, Featured Home Page News, National Headlines
pro build

Wilson Bayly Holmes-Ovcon the parent company of Probuild said in a statement announcing it had put Probuild and a group of related companies into administration.

The decision has had many asking how could such a large building company collapse?

Australia has fallen into a vicious cycle, The project owners push all the risk onto construction companies, generally through fixed-price contracts. The construction firms, facing stiff competition, take on these contracts on extraordinarily slim margins.

Peter Jeeves, national manager of construction at Lockton says, “why has the construction industry’s financial plumbing clogged up? Because this is a sector with too much risk and not nearly enough reward.”

The Tourism News Related Stories

Related Business Resources: If Russia invades Ukraine, how will it affect Australia?

Related Community: Brisbane giant with 450 jobs up for grabs

From AFR 25.2.22

If you want to understand the collapse of construction giant Probuild, just follow the money.

As Johannesburg-listed parent company Wilson Bayly Holmes-Ovcon said in its statement announcing it had put Probuild and a group of related companies into administration, raising financial guarantees from lenders to secure new work has become increasingly difficult in recent times.

The construction sector’s system of risk allocation is badly broken.  David Rowe

Peter Jeeves, national manager of construction at Lockton, the world’s largest privately owned insurance brokerage, also says insurers have been pulling back from the construction sector for some time.

“We’ve seen the insurance market appetite and capacity for construction professional indemnity shrink significantly in the last three or four years leading to reduced competition, significantly higher premiums and restrictions in coverage,” he says.

And why has the construction industry’s financial plumbing clogged up? Because this is a sector with too much risk and not nearly enough reward.

Clearly Probuild has been caught in something of a perfect storm caused by the pandemic. As Australian Constructors Association chief executive Jon Davies explains, many of its current projects would be being built under fixed-price contracts signed well before the supply chain disruptions and explosion in labour costs caused by the pandemic.

“We’ve seen significant price escalation in the market and there’s no opportunity to recover that,” Davies says.

‘The system is broken’

Moreover, many contracts will require construction companies to pay liquidated damages if they can’t recover time lost to COVID-19-related delays.

But the problem here is much deeper than a pandemic profitability squeeze, according to Nicola Grayson, CEO of engineering industry lobby group Consult Australia. “The system is broken,” she says.

Whether it is in infrastructure or commercial building, Australia has fallen into a vicious cycle where project owners look to push all the risk in a project onto construction companies, typically through fixed price contracts. The construction firms, facing stiff competition, take on these contracts on extraordinarily slim margins. For example, Lendlease’s target EBITDA margin for its construction division in 2022 is between 2 per cent and 3 per cent.

This margin seems crazy when you consider the risk and complexity involved in a big project. But it’s even crazier when you consider the nature of these take-it-or-leave it contracts that give construction companies few avenues to recoup margin – except, as Grayson points out, by pushing the risk down the line onto project participants such as the engineering firms, which then find themselves taking on outsized risks.

Remarkably, there’s near universal agreement on the solutions: vastly improving scoping of projects, so risks can be properly assessed and priced; a recognition that project owners must share some risks; and a more collaborative approach from all parties.

Davies says it is starting to happen, with governments becoming more cognisant of the need to set contracts up with better risk sharing. He agrees with Grayson that model clients are also needed in the private sector; governments can play a role there too, through their involvement in public private partnerships.

But the construction sector also needs to recognise that the merry-go-round needs to stop.

“We need to shift our mindset away from ‘we’ll fix this problem because we’ll just get that next job that will either tide us over or give us the extra profitability we need’,” Davies says. “We’ve been doing that for too long, which is why the pressure has been building and building.”

Deloitte, which got Virgin flying again in 2020, is now in control of Probuild and intends to keep building sites open while it runs a rigorous and rapid sale process.

Grayson hopes Probuild’s collapse might see the small number of construction firms that have become more selective about taking on uneconomic problems grow. But she doubts the pain is over.

“This has been coming for some time. And, unfortunately, we’re going to see this again, unless some action is taken to balance out the risk allocation,” she says.

You may also read!

Gold Coast Beer & Cider Festival

After being forced to postpone by last year’s pandemic, the inaugural Gold Coast Beer & Cider Festival will now take place

Read More...

Cambodian fisherman catches largest recorded freshwater fish in Mekong River

A fisherman in Cambodia has caught the largest recorded freshwater fish on record in the Mekong river. The stingray measured

Read More...

Northern Australian beaches hit by tonnes of plastic waste from Asia

An indigenous ranger group are saying an environmental mess is growing in far northern Australia, saying it is the

Read More...

Mobile Sliding Menu